John on August 6, 2009 at 12:15 am
I recommend reading the whole thing, but here’s a sample:
[W]hen the government spends money on health care, the patient does not. The patient is then separated from the transaction in the sense that costs are no longer his concern. And when the patient doesn’t care about costs, only those who want higher costsâ€”like doctors and drug companiesâ€”care.
Thus, health-care reform should be based on policies that diminish the health-care wedge rather than increase it. Mr. Obama’s reform principlesâ€”a public health-insurance option, mandated minimum coverage, mandated coverage of pre-existing conditions, and required purchase of health insuranceâ€”only increase the size of the wedge and thus health-care costs.
According to research I performed for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a $1 trillion increase in federal government health subsidies will accelerate health-care inflation, lead to continued growth in health-care expenditures, and diminish our economic growth even further. Despite these costs, some 30 million people will remain uninsured.
Implementing Mr. Obama’s reforms would literally be worse than doing nothing.
Laffer goes on to offer an alternative, market-based solution to Obamacare. It’s a timely reminder that we’re not stuck with the President’s plan or nothing. It’s also not now or never. That stuff is all about politics and who will be up or down in 2010 and 2012. It’s not about creating the best system for Americans.
Category: Health & Education |