RSS 2.0 Follow Us!
 

Related Posts

NY Times Spiked Obama-ACORN Story Prior to Election

John on March 30, 2009 at 4:40 pm

The paper which revealed details of our electronic surveillance of suspected terrorists and our efforts to track their money suddenly got cautious just prior to the election:

Heather Heidelbaugh, who represented the Pennsylvania Republican State Committee in the lawsuit against the group, recounted for the committee what she had been told by a former ACORN worker who had worked in the group’s Washington, D.C. office. The former worker, Anita Moncrief, told Ms. Heidelbaugh last October, during the state committee’s litigation against ACORN, she had been a “confidential informant for several months to The New York Times reporter, Stephanie Strom.”

Ms. Moncrief had been providing Ms. Strom with information about ACORN’s election activities. Ms. Strom had written several stories based on information Ms. Moncrief had given her.

During her testimony, Ms. Heidelbaugh said Ms. Moncrief had told her The New York Times articles stopped when she revealed that the Obama presidential campaign had sent its maxed-out donor list to ACORN’s Washington, D.C. office.

Ms. Moncrief told Ms. Heidelbaugh the campaign had asked her and her boss to “reach out to the maxed-out donors and solicit donations from them for Get Out the Vote efforts to be run by ACORN.”

Ms. Heidelbaugh then told the congressional panel:

“Upon learning this information and receiving the list of donors from the Obama campaign, Ms. Strom reported to Ms. Moncrief that her editors at The New York Times wanted her to kill the story because, and I quote, “it was a game changer.”‘

It’s almost unbelievable that their bias is this blatant. Almost.

Allah style exit question: Is this kind of coordination with an outside organization illegal?

[HT: Gateway Pundit]

Post to Twitter

Category: MSM & Bias |

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.