RSS 2.0 Follow Us!

Related Posts

Obamanation: Barack is Lying About His Abortion Record

John on August 11, 2008 at 2:33 pm

Barack Obama’s extremism (and I use that word advisedly) on abortion. Not only did he take an extreme position, he has lied about it ever since:

During Obama’s 2008 run for President, his campaign and his defenders have asserted repeatedly and forcefully that it is a distortion, or even a smear, to suggest that Obama opposed a state born-alive bill that was the same as the federal bill. See, for example, this June 30, 2008 “factcheck” issued by the Obama campaign, in the form that it still appeared on the Obama website on August 7, 2008. The Obama “cover story” has often been repeated as fact, or at least without challenge, in major organs of the news media. (Two recent examples: CNN reported on June 30, 2008, “Senator Obama says if he had been in the U.S. Senate in 2002, he, too, would have voted in favor of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act because unlike the Illinois bill, it included language protecting Roe v. Wade.” The New York Times reported in a story on August 7, 2008 that Obama “said he had opposed the bill because it was poorly drafted and would have threatened the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established abortion as a constitutional right. He said he would have voted for a similar bill that passed the United States Senate because it did not have the same constitutional flaw as the Illinois bill.”)


For the moment we can set that debate aside, however, for this reason: Documents obtained by NRLC now demonstrate conclusively that Obama’s entire defense is based on a brazen factual misrepresentation.

The documents prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the Illinois state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the “neutrality clause” (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state BAIPA, with Obama voting in support of adding the revision. Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4.

This isn’t the first time Obama has fudged the details on his positions but this example seems particularly egregious. The NY Times and CNN have once again carried water for their preferred candidate. When will they stop taking Obama at his word and start checking the facts?

That aside, it’s worth knowing that “The One” voted for a bill that would allow babies born as the result of failed abortions to die, rather than granting them protection under the law. That’s an Obamanation.

[HT: Hot Air]

Post to Twitter

Category: Politics, Pro-Life |

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.