RSS 2.0 Follow Us!
 

Related Posts

Global Warming Consensus?

John on August 30, 2007 at 10:01 am

Not according to a new study/review of studies published since 2004 which found that more than half of climate study authors are skeptical of global warming claims:

In 2004, history professor Naomi Oreskes performed a survey of research papers on climate change. Examining peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI Web of Science database from 1993 to 2003, she found a majority supported the “consensus view,” defined as humans were having at least some effect on global climate change. Oreskes’ work has been repeatedly cited, but as some of its data is now nearly 15 years old, its conclusions are becoming somewhat dated.

Medical researcher Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte recently updated this research. Using the same database and search terms as Oreskes, he examined all papers published from 2004 to February 2007. The results have been submitted to the journal Energy and Environment, of which DailyTech has obtained a pre-publication copy. The figures are surprising.

Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers “implicit” endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no “consensus.”

There really is a scientific debate going on. Global warming may indeed be occurring at a fairly slow rate, but man’s role as the sole or primary cause is not as settled as Al Gore and others would wish it to be.

Post to Twitter

Category: Climate Change & Environment |

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.