John on February 28, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Interesting story in Newsweek about a dig taking place in Turkey at the northern tip of the fertile crescent. The temple complex discovered there is the oldest known monumental architecture, dating to 11,500 BC:
The site isn’t just old, it redefines old: the temple was built 11,500 years agoâ€”a staggering 7,000 years before the Great Pyramid, and more than 6,000 years before Stonehenge first took shape. The ruins are so early that they predate villages, pottery, domesticated animals, and even agricultureâ€”the first embers of civilization.
In fact that is the theory being promoted by the archaeologist leading the dig:
Schmidt’s thesis is simple and bold: it was the urge to worship that brought mankind together in the very first urban conglomerations. The need to build and maintain this temple, he says, drove the builders to seek stable food sources, like grains and animals that could be domesticated, and then to settle down to guard their new way of life. The temple begat the city…
In the old model, shepherds and farmers appeared first, and then created pottery, villages, cities, specialized labor, kings, writing, art, andâ€”somewhere on the way to the airplaneâ€”organized religion. As far back as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, thinkers have argued that the social compact of cities came first, and only then the “high” religions with their great temples, a paradigm still taught in American high schools.
Religion now appears so early in civilized lifeâ€”earlier than civilized life, if Schmidt is correctâ€”that some think it may be less a product of culture than a cause of it…
Since the temples predate any known settlement anywhere, Schmidt concludes that man’s first house was a house of worship: “First the temple, then the city,” he insists.
Category: Archaeology |