RSS 2.0 Follow Us!

Related Posts

MSNBC Should Fire Norah O’Donnell

John on November 20, 2009 at 9:16 am

This is a case of grade A media bias. It’s so blatant that only MSNBC could pull something like this and not be ashamed. Remember this video?

YouTube Preview Image

Susan Roesgen, the CNN reporter in that clip, was fired three months later. Kudos to CNN for not allowing this blatant display of bias to define their network.

Now have a look at this clip (just watch the first 20 seconds):

YouTube Preview Image

What you don’t see just before the clip starts is a long roving shot of Norah just walking down the line of people waiting to see Palin. Norah just happens to stop and ask this particular 17 year-old girl about her t-shirt. And Norah just happens to have this johnny-on-the-spot response which leaves the girl flummoxed.

Here’s what really happened as told by the girl in that clip:

I was first approached by a New York Times writer who wrote what my shirt said and then asked me a couple questions. She asked me what it was I liked about Sarah Palin. I said, “As a young female she is someone I can look up to, before her the only prominent female in politics I had known about was Hilary Clinton, whom I respect don’t get me wrong, I respect her but when you don’t agree with someone it’s hard to really look up to them. I like how Sarah Palin will speak her mind, regardless of what the media will say about it.”

….Seconds later I met her… One of the many faces of liberal media bias. She asked me my name and then before going on air asked me why I liked Sarah Palin, I repeated what I told the NYT reporter. Norah didn’t seem to like that much…I noticed her look down at my shirt then, she turned around blackberry in hand spoke to a man, thumbs tapping the blackberry…then jotted down a quick note. Little did I know that note would be used against me. She told us she’d be walking up to us. You know like she just stumbled upon us.

The shot began… I kept telling myself answer her question well, don’t freak out. Well, I thought she’d ask me the same question. She asked the man beside me…the same question she had before we went on air. Myself on the other hand, not the same story. She had me read my shirt and then proceeded to ask me “Did you know Sarah Palin supported the bailout” to be 100% honest I was like, are you kidding me? She is trying to use my shirt against me. I was so shocked by the craftiness she had that I was truly stumped. I asked her where she got her fact and she read her little note.

Sarah Palin oppo-researcher impersonates journalist on MSNBC, film at 11.

Actually, this is much worse than Susan Roesgen. Susan Roesgen, biased as she was, was at least speaking off-the-cuff. Norah O’Donnell actually set up this little gotcha moment as if she were Michael Moore. She didn’t know the facts (or wasn’t sure of them), so she had to check them on her blackberry, but then she made it look as if it were all spur of the moment.

Of course Norah O’Donnell knows that a VP never disagrees with the head of the ticket and McCain supported the TARP bailout. But, hey, it’s all in a day’s work at MSNBC. If you can embarrass a 17 year-old on camera at a Sarah Palin event, you go for it.

Susan Roesgen deserved to lose her job. CNN chose not to let blatant on-air bias define them. What Norah O’Donnell did is worse. MSNBC should fire Norah O’Donnell. Until that happens (I won’t hold my breath) some enterprising reporter should ask Robert Gibbs if this is why MSNBC is the White House’s favorite network.

[HT: Hot Air headlines for the link to the 17 year old blogger]

Category: MSM & Bias |

8 Comments

  1. Geoffrey Britain

    Norah O’Donnell doesn’t see herself as a journalist.

    She sees herself as an agenda advocate.

    She’s willing to conceal that advocacy within a masquerade of pretense, as a traditional objective journalist because she believes that the ends justify the means.

    Perhaps 85% of ‘journalists’ and the media companies that employ them now fall within that categorization.

    The only difference between them is the degree to which they are willing to be disingenuous in pursuit of their shared agenda.

    O’Donnell is simply one of the many propaganda shills for the democratic party, embedded within MSNBC.

    November 20, 2009 @ 10:12 am
  2. John

    Geoffrey,

    I think you’re right that what’s offensive here isn’t a liberal POV, it’s a liberal POV disguising itself as non-partisan journalism.

    That and using a 17 year old as a prop.

    November 20, 2009 @ 11:17 am
  3. Jim

    I say put this O’Donnell in the Octagon again Palin and let them go at it. My money’s on Palin to mop the floor with her.

    November 20, 2009 @ 7:25 pm
  4. DKF

    Feature the 17-year-old on FOX against Nora O’Donnell’s time slot . . .as an occasional reporter relaying color on young voters.

    November 20, 2009 @ 8:52 pm
  5. Count Crash

    This is a tactic used by the ignorant to try to embarass the un-informed. So a woman whose job it is to report on polictics has to use a cheat sheet? Are you freakin’ kidding me?! And she has to use it on a 17 yr old!!!!! Was the preschool closed?! Or maybe she was hard pressed to find some 10 yr olds that she could intimidate and had to settle for a 17yr old?! What a poor excuse for a supposedly intelligent woman. And then commenting with that wanna be Klan member Mathews on how white everyone was? And this is called hardball journalism? I guess maybe in N.Korea but not in the U.S. of America it’s not! I don’t like violence but this proves that some people need a good smack to the head to set them straight.

    November 20, 2009 @ 9:02 pm
  6. Mary Sue

    I completely missed this in the Hot Air headlines. My first recollection of Norah O’Donnell was during the Bush/Gore election back in the day when MSNBC wasn’t completely hijacked to the left. She stood out then as biased now she blends in with the crowd there.

    I can’t believe she did this to a young girl, what a nasty woman. The fact that she tried to pretend she had stumbled on these people without pre-screening them is really pathetic. She had to verify it herself on her blackberry then she ambushes a young girl to make her look uninformed. What kind of woman does this?

    November 20, 2009 @ 10:01 pm
  7. Desperately Seeking Sarah « Nice Deb

    [...] the heck?! What was Mitchell trying to do? Get her autograph? Were there no teenage girls in line there to bully? Sadly, Weasel offered no further info to go with the pix. Dan Riehl did add some captions, [...]

    November 21, 2009 @ 9:34 pm
  8. Richard

    The name the poor gentleman was searching for was Henry Paulson, Republican Secretary of the Treasury in Bush’s Administration.

    November 24, 2009 @ 12:02 am

Leave a reply

  1. You will post the following soon.
    Go ahead and start typing.