Comments on: Timeline: Iran vs. the US in Iraq (Newly Updated 8-07)

By: youwilldiecowards

youwilldiecowards — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:30:23 +0000

This is another sold out, “hook line and sinker” concocted story by the US and its allies to have another excuse to go to war against Iran.
The US is bankrupt and is controlled by the “BANKERS” running their country to a have a “controlled” demolition internally and externally to create a scenario of “CHAOS” so that they will enrich themselves to establish “ORDER”.
IN CHAOS THERE IS ORDER, is their motto. An ORDER to use their weapons to make money (weapons manufacturers in the US, happening ever since all wars they’ve supplied around the globe). An ORDER to construct a new government in “CONQUERED” places by the US and its allies. An ORDER to “PLUNDER” the natural resources (oil, gold, etc.) and seize all the assets and treasures therein. An ORDER to “RECONSTRUCT” all the facilities they have destroyed and appear to be humanitarian in the process while enriching themselves in all the constructive efforts.
There is much more. Please wake up and figure out WHOM is really running the show behind the US and its allies. The hint is BILDERBERG group, ROCKERFELLER (Tri-Lateral Commision, “Tri” pyramid symbolical of their masonic group), FEDERAL RESERVE (US private entity masquerading as a US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY), IMF (Internation Monetary Fund), robbers of natural resources in third world countries) and WORLD BANK (robbers of all nations).
In the search for WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ (which they’ve found none), the US is still in IRAQ plundering the rich oil fields that EX PRESIDENT BUSH has a stake in, he does after all have BUSINESS IN OIL even in the US.
Now for this so called SEARCH FOR A SECRET NUCLEAR FACILITY IN IRAN will become their preemptive reason to make WAR and the same old process recurring again.
ITS IMPERIALISM ALL OVER AGAIN PEOPLE, WAKE UP.

By: Wordtodawise

Wordtodawise — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:38:28 +0000

Iraq war…a game gone bad

If the outcome of the Iraq invasion and occupation was not so tragic, it would be laughable to think that all members of congress who voted to start military intrusion into Iraq were deceived by the bush administration.

Far from it, all those who voted for the war including Clinton, Biden, Edward and Dodd knew what they were doing. They took a calculated political risk in part to brace a perceived weak spine in matters of national defense. The other profound reason was to fulfill their obligation to special interest groups whose agenda is counter to real American interest. Think about it deeply.

All these pitiful escapists who are now prostrating at the altar of empty regrets should be held accountable just as George Bush and his cronies. These people should not be rewarded for their lack of vision and leadership at the critical moment when supreme judgment and courage were demanded.

Obama is the man for president. After all, what he saw sitting down in the valley, others couldn’t standing atop the hill. What other test of leadership can there be other than the ability to make sound decisions using instinctive judgment in the face of uncertainty.

All those who favored the disastrous incursion into Iraq should be held accountable because they failed in their duty as leaders to protect the vital interests of America, freedom and national security.

Wordtodawise

By: Somebody Blinked. « I Think ^(Link) Therefore I Err

Somebody Blinked. « I Think ^(Link) Therefore I Err — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:51:01 +0000

[...] that those arrests were made after the Iranians have ambushed a joint Iraqi/American patrol.) (see Verum Serum for a nice timeline of Iranian involvement in [...]

By: Terri

Terri — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 13:47:58 +0000

Awesome post. Very helpful. I remember these things but never close enough in time to re-find them when I want them!!

By: m in the UK

m in the UK — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:04:26 +0000

Thank you Leenie… it is always good to know we have friends.

I also make this separate point for our American friends.

The British culture for servicemen – is that they aren’t heroes.

They are PROFESSIONALS – they are voluntees to become paid soldiers / servicemen in the service of Queen and country.

As such they know the risks. This is one reason (I think) for the differences at home where the British (media aside) are seeming more resilient to the drip drip drip effect of casualties on morale at home.
q.v. experiences in Northern Ireland… an insurgency…. have caused this.

It’s becoming apparent that the UK media has become somewhat “americanised”? If that is the correct word. i.e. a political-lobbying tool.

What must and should be kept paramount in mind for everyone

- is that British forces are PROFESSIONAL SERVICE PEOPLE. i.e. they sign on for life…. and are rewarded when they retire.
(and obviously when “home” should be treated with respect for their professionalism).

“Hero ? No – just doing the professional duty required by my country.”

This is something American’s need to keep in mind….

Almost a “contract” (something American’s may understand?) – between the people (Queen in our case) and country.

I think it is because British don’t like “cheesiness” by nature …. and hero seems to be used for just about everything these days.

This is something the media needs to get to grips with….

We can all be grateful to servicepeople for PROFESSIONALISM – not just to describe them as “heroes”.

On the issue of these service people held as HOSTAGE.

They were taken ILLEGALLY. And now Iran is demanding an APOLOGY from us when we weren’t even in their waters.

Why should we?

And why are people ASSUMING CONSPIRACIES????

Why have people lost faith in their insititutions?

Finally, I compare the OBVIOUS INSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION OF PEOPLE TO HATE THE WEST (BRITAIN) in IRAN.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6515995.stm

I compare that in Britain – PEOPLE ARE NOT EDUCATED TO HATE ANYONE!!!

By: John

John — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:32:17 +0000

Joyce,

I’m up for steps 1 and 2. They probably deserve that much just for the number of American and British soldiers they’ve helped kill in Iraq. But I wouldn’t want to see a bunch of Iranian civilians get blown up because of the creepy theocratic regime that runs things.

It sounds like the Brits are going to kowtow and get this over with. I hope so. The truth about what happened will come out once the soldiers are home.

By: Joyce

Joyce — Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:16:02 +0000

Steps to take to get those Brits released.

1. Total Blockade

2. Take out their navy

3. Take out Tehran

End of story.

By: Leenie

Leenie — Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:42:31 +0000

Note to m in the UK:

The US is with you! These Iranian lunatics have stepped over the line, big time. This hostage-taking is an act of war and should be treated as such.

No one has been fooled by the obviously fake letters from those brave marines and sailors. Hopefully they will continue to do what they must to stay alive until they are released–more likely rescued–from these ba$tards.

Keep faith. Your servicemen and women are in our prayers. Hopefully our governments will find their backbones and do what is right and necessary.

By: Colin Nelson

Colin Nelson — Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:04:07 +0000

Excellent work much needed for the non-intel folks to get a solid understanding of the game that is afoot.

By: m in the UK

m in the UK — Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:04:13 +0000

The PROPOGANDA in a “3rd Letter” directed to “THE BRITISH PEOPLE” has been published…

More grammatical and language errors…

More geopolitical statements.

Iraninan-Theocracy – WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL??????