Comments on: Smearing Palin’s Faith (Update)

By: Jim

Jim — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:38:40 +0000

Wrong again Rick. When Bush cut taxes revenues rose in the Treasury 20% higher than Clinton’s best year in office. Clinton raised taxes, Bush cut taxes = we received more tax revenue from the Bush tax cuts. It was his spending that killed him although we had to rebuild our military after Clinton decimated it.

Raise taxes on corporations (I’m part of one) and we’ll just pass this additional cost onto the consumer. Like it or not, it’s a fact of life. A few CEO’s getting huge salaries isn’t the norm – you’re making a sweeping generalization that would make Obama proud.

By: Rick Frueh

Rick Frueh — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:44:00 +0000

It is time we get loosed from the choke hold of corperations who use overseas work and use their tax braeks to give 100 milion dollar CEO pensions. Taxing them fairly will give rise to other companies with our best interests at heart.

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:40:48 +0000

By the way, his increased taxation on corporations, who would pass this increase cost onto their customers in the form of higher prices, would wipe out any tax cuts he would give. I’d bet the average American woud have less in their pockets because of his tax policies.

By: Jim

Jim — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:17:46 +0000

Let’s also not forget the last time a Democrat promised us a middle class tax cut (Clinton, 1992). I’m still waiting for it. And keep in mind that Obama’s character makes it suspect that he would ever folllow through on a middle class tax cut – the guy will say anything to get elected.

By: Jim

Jim — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:10:49 +0000

Karl Marx would love that Rick.

By: Rick Frueh

Rick Frueh — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:14:35 +0000

Obama would only recind the Bush tax cuts for people making over 250,000 and give their cuts to the middle class.

By: Lurkers Wife

Lurkers Wife — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:37:21 +0000

Pro-lifers have made some mild inroads into the abortion industry. For example, see the new law in South Dakota which requires abortionists to tell their patients that they are taking a human life. Look at requirements in various states for parental notification. How about the ban on partial birth abortions? They’re not complete victories, for sure, but they’re inroads.

As to the whole sex ed thing, don’t buy Obama’s backpedaling on this one. Read the actual bill he voted for. The whole thing about pedophiles is an attempt to falsely characterize what the actual vote was about. The kindergarten curriculum included information about masturbation, physical reactions to arousal, etc. For 5 and 6 year olds.

By: Jim

Jim — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:08:09 +0000

For the record, Cindy’s struggles with prescription meds is a twenty-year old story. During that time period, Obama was using drugs as well.

By: Jim

Jim — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 18:01:30 +0000

Obama would rescind the Bush tax cuts. By doing that, everyones taxes go up. The Keating Five is old news. Not even the MSM are whipping that dog. Cindy McCain a drug addict? LOL. Is she running for president?

By: Rick Frueh

Rick Frueh — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:28:58 +0000

Obama has not resorted to the Keating Five scandal or the cover up and non-prosecution of Cindy McCain’s massive drug addiction and illegal (limbaugh) prescription operation. McCain has also claimed Obama would raise taxes to the middle class which Fact Check said was just an outright lie since Obama’s plan calls for more of a middle class tax break than McCain’s (Bush’s)